7 people answered the 28-question form before it closed on 10 September. Hanna hasn't filled it in yet. Counts are of people, out of seven. Every free-text answer is on this page word for word: open "Every answer" on any card.
Leading option Tied Other options
Start again, lead with defence and government, and answer the spec questions before anyone asks them.
Everyone named Defence and Intelligence buyers and Government and national security as key audiences. Climate and environmental organisations got two ticks.
Five of seven ticked "start again from scratch". Nobody ticked the navigation, the Insights section, the use case pages or the tone of the copy as worth keeping.
The copy is named as the worst thing more often than the design. In Camilla's words, "it under sells us so profoundly".
The group is split down the middle on whether Defence and Intelligence leads or the capability leads. That, how to organise the work, and gating are Hanna's to settle.
7 of 7
named Defence and Intelligence buyers and Government and national security as key audiences
5 of 7
said start again from scratch. Nothing else got more than two ticks
3 v 3
on whether Defence and Intelligence leads, or the capability leads with sectors underneath
Settled
Clear majority or no dissent. Bank these into the brief.
For Hanna to settle
Per the process we agreed, the casting vote sits with Hanna. Each pop-out lays out the options, who backs each, and why.
What they said, question by question
The free-text questions, themed. The green dot marks the theme most people raised.
Loose ends and things nobody asked for
Raised by one or two people. Worth a decision, but not a vote.